Categories
Education Lessons Nonfiction Observations

The Oral Exam (I).

A psychiatrist on Twitter recently asked me if I could share a series of posts I had written in the past about the psychiatry oral board exam.

Here’s my answer.

The series was originally written in May 2009. May it be helpful to psychiatrists who are finishing their training. May it be amusing and perhaps illuminating to the general public who wonder what “board certified” means.

(P.S. Original content will come soon. In the past few months, I have experienced notable shifts in life change units according to the Holmes and Rahe stress scale. Thank you for your patience.)


As medical students, we had all heard about “board exams”. By the time we graduated from medical school, we had already taken two medical licensing exams (the USMLE). As interns, we began to hear about the specific board exams for our chosen specialty. However, most of us didn’t expend too much mental energy about the specialty board exam, as we still had to take the third medical licensing exam.

The board exam in psychiatry involves two parts: a written exam (multiple choice questions on a computer) and an oral exam. Residents take the written exam in the last year of their residency—literally days before the end of their training—and, upon passing, are then eligible to sit for the oral exam the following year.

Most people feel some anxiety about the written exam, as with most standardized exams that represent hurdles one must hop over (doesn’t have to be a graceful leap with a silent finish; you just have to get over the dang thing) before advancing to The Next Stage. By the time the written exam comes around, though, people know how these events go: we had all taken numerous exams and filled in thousands upon thousands of bubbles, whether by pencil, pen, or the click of a mouse.

The oral exam, though, is something else completely. There’s a lot of lore about the oral exam in psychiatry and it just freaks everyone out.

To be clear, not every single specialty has an oral exam. My understanding is that family practice, internal medicine, and pathology do not have oral exams. Those physicians fill in a lot of bubbles and BAM—they’re board certified.

Radiology, surgery, anesthesiology, psychiatry, and neurology have oral exams. (These are not comprehensive lists. These lists tell you more about the physicians I know and talk with.)

You can imagine that some people feel some mild bitterness about this.

This is the current (NB: “current” means “as of 2009”) structure of the oral board exam in psychiatry. It occurs in two parts:

(1) The trainee interviews an actual patient for 30 minutes. Two examiners (who know nothing more about the patient than the trainee) observe this interview. In the following 30 minutes, the two examiners ask the trainee questions about diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and any other issues they deem pertinent.

(2) The trainee rotates through four “stations”, with 12 minutes at each station. At three of the stations, there is a written patient vignette that one examiner gives to the trainee. The examiner then asks questions about diagnosis or treatment related to the vignette. The fourth station features a video clip of a patient interview. As with the written vignettes, the examiner asks the trainee questions related to diagnosis and treatment.

The ultimate goal is to eliminate the live patient interview and use vignettes only. I believe the live patient interview will be phased out in three or four years. This shift is due to the highly variable nature of the live patient interview. No two patients are the same and this lack of reliability across trainees is problematic. Though the live patient interview allows the trainee to showcase her interviewing/empathic/”I come across as a nice person” skills, it does not necessarily offer opportunities to demonstrate sufficient knowledge of the field. Does that make sense?

Please also note that DSM-V is scheduled to come out in 2012 (NB: this has been pushed back to May 2013). You can imagine that some of the current trainees feel some mild bitterness about the changes in this examination system. (Really, I’m not one of them.)

The reason why people get totally freaked out about the oral exam is because we hear so many horror stories about the experience. And if they’re not horror stories, they’re tales of discomfort.

  • “My patient was partially deaf and blind and I had to shout at him the whole time.”
  • “My patient kept telling me that I wasn’t making sense and telling the examiners to fail me.”
  • “My patient wouldn’t talk.”
  • “My patient just got up in the middle of the interview and left.”
  • “My examiners kept interrupting me and they sounded really sarcastic.”
  • “My examiners kept frowning at me and asking me if I was sure about my answers.”
  • “One of my examiners looked like he was going to laugh at me during my entire presentation.”
  • “One of my examiners asked totally obscure questions about which chromosomes are involved in this disorder.”
  • “One of my examiners wanted me to discuss the history and evolution of understanding of schizophrenia in Portugal during the Industrial Revolution.”

You get my point.

We’re told, of course, that examiners are instructed to keep completely straight faces. They’re not supposed to smile, nod, or offer any signs of any encouragement. They’re supposed to be bland. We’re not supposed to gauge our performances on their facial expressions, style of questioning, or anything else.

(Never mind that SO MUCH of human interaction lies in these non-verbal cues. This is exactly why some people don’t like speaking with psychoanalysts—if there’s nothing there, some people find it unsettling and not therapeutic.)

I had the good fortune of training in a residency program that went through “mock oral board exams” annually (which apparently isn’t the norm, as I have learned this year in my fellowship). And, as a resident, it was unnerving to go through that practice, particularly if your mock examiner was, say, the chair of the department or the training director. No one wants to look like an untherapeutic idiot in front of the boss.

There is some comfort in knowing, though, that the actual oral exam won’t happen for a while. “I have time to prepare for that,” we muse. “I have to get through the written part first.”

Well, time passes.


I took my oral board exam in early April (2009). To prepare for it, I did the following:

  • made flashcards (yes, I’m analog like that) of most of the diagnoses in DSM-IV-TR, but not the adolescent stuff, and went through them a lot
  • read through all of the APA practice guidelines
  • read through a study guide dedicated for the oral board exam
  • underwent five mock interviews with attendings and patients who were obliging enough to help me study and improve

I embarked on all of this about five months prior to my exam date.

My other preparations included:

  • making arrangements to NOT stay at the hotel that the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology claimed as “home base” (because I didn’t want to spend time with a whole bunch of anxious neurologists and psychiatrists)
  • making plans to meet up with friends from residency and go out for a leisurely, quiet dinner the night prior to the exam (this was undoubtedly the highlight of the weekend)
  • bringing along The Beau for company and laughter
  • utilizing all of my healthy, effective coping strategies to reduce my anxiety (as opposed to eating a whole lot of cookies)

After checking my luggage three times to make sure I had everything (“Registration slip? Check. Suit? Check. Pad of paper and pen? Check. Water bottle? Check. Novel to read while waiting? Check. Sense of humor? Check.”), I hopped onto a Bolt Bus early Saturday morning outside of Penn Station. Four hours later, The Beau and I walked through the streets of Chinatown in the bright sunlight and cool air. We were in Boston.

“It’s really clean here… and where are all the people?” I mused.

Categories
Consult-Liaison Education Informal-curriculum Lessons Medicine Observations

Informal Curriculum: Lesson 4.

Another lesson in the informal curriculum is how to interrupt patients.[1. The skill of interrupting is also useful for unfocused patient presentations, preoccupied nurses, and rambling doctors.]

Due to financial challenges in the healthcare system, patients and physicians have decreasing amounts of time with each other. Doctors need specific information for an accurate diagnosis, which guides appropriate treatment. Sometimes patients want to share information that they believe to be important, but it may not be clinically relevant.[2. Physicians should take care: Sometimes the information that patients find important is, in fact, relevant, though we may not initially recognize this.] Confusion and frustration result when patients view their information as both important and relevant, while doctor finds the information to be neither important nor relevant.

When medical students learn to interview patients, they often nod, smile, and exhibit body language that tacitly encourages patients to continue, even if patients are sharing anecdotes about a recent vacation. Afterwards, when I ask students for their opinions about their interviews, they often express disappointment.

“I didn’t get the information I needed. But I didn’t want to interrupt because I didn’t want to be rude. It seemed like that the patient really wanted to talk about her vacation.”

Two points to consider:

Firstly, though the dialogue between patient and doctor may seem to follow the rules of a usual conversation, the clinical interview is not a normal social interaction.

Do you routinely ask your friends or family if they are are experiencing side effects from medications? if they are having regular menstrual cycles? if they’re thinking about killing themselves? if they’re passing gas?

Such questions rarely come up in usual social interactions. Imagine how other people might react if you asked these questions during a dinner date, while waiting in line at the grocery store, or in an elevator.

Context matters.

Secondly, consider short-term versus long-term goals. Physicians don’t want to be rude to patients. Building and maintaining rapport is important in clinical care. However, patients (often reluctantly!) see physicians to receive guidance and treatment for their health. These are not friendships. If you require history to arrive at a diagnosis and treatment and you are unable to get that information, then you are not actually helping the patient. It may feel better in the short-term to let patients share irrelevant information, but, in the long-term, the health of patients will not change.

So, what are some ways to interrupt people while minimizing rudeness?

The vast majority of patients understand that time with their physicians is limited. Patients who talk a lot often know that they talk a lot. Orienting patients to the possibility of interruptions before starting can be extraordinarily helpful if the need arises.

All human beings want acknowledgment that you heard and understood what they said. I often counsel medical students to jump in when they can (when the patient takes a breath, when the patient is trailing off, etc.) and briefly summarize the last few things the patient said, and then append a question. Example:

“… she always says it’s my fault and I never do anything right and she only says that when things don’t go the way she wants them to and she never sees all the things I do right and when I point them out she thinks I’m being arrogant but I’m just trying to point out that I do some things right most of the time—”

“You get upset when your girlfriend doesn’t see how hard you try—how have your blood sugars been?”

Bonus points if you can tie the summary sentence to your question (e.g. “With all of that frustration you’ve felt with your girlfriend, have you noticed if it has affected your blood sugars?”).

This strategy requires your full attention. If your summary statement is completely inaccurate, your patient will feel vexed.

Other strategies, with increasing urgency (always done with respect):

  1. Say the person’s name (most people will stop talking).
  2. Lean forward and express urgency on your face.
  3. Make some other sound (e.g. firmly putting your hand on a table) in addition to saying the person’s name and leaning forward.

Never raise your voice or shout.

I advise students to try different methods of interruption with friends, family, and classmates, and ask them to gauge what seems to work, what doesn’t seem to work, and how people respond. These experiments serve both as practice for interrupting people in general, but also shapes behavior to interrupt with grace and tact.


Categories
Consult-Liaison Education Informal-curriculum Lessons Medicine Observations

Informal Curriculum: Lesson 3.

My third recommendation for the informal curriculum about interviewing patients: Respond in the moment to what patients say and do.[1. There are instances when it is prudent to withhold or alter responses. Further discussions about this require an introduction to learning theory. If you want to learn more, please see Pryor’s Don’t Shoot the Dog to learn about reinforcement and how to use that on animals… including humans.] Patients tell physicians information that is difficult to talk about or rarely discussed. If William Osler was correct in advising, “Listen to your patient, he is telling you the diagnosis,” then you must clearly communicate to the patient that you are listening, so he can continue to tell you the diagnosis. The way you respond to patients will affect the amount of information patients will choose to share with you.

You do not need to say a word to respond to patients. A nod can encourage patients to continue with details. A smile can reinforce decisions to change health behaviors. Furrowed brows can express concern. Putting down the pen or stopping the typing can highlight your wish to help the patient. Do you know the color of your patient’s eyes? Taking the second to do that will help you attend to the person in front of you.

Your responses can be utterances. All of those sounds we make that aren’t words can be helpful. The “mm hmm”, “hmm…”, and “huh” take less than a second to utter and tell your patient that you’re listening to them. Example:

I’ve had this pain in my right side for about two weeks. (mm hm) Sometimes it gets really bad and it’s hard to breathe. (hmm) I thought I strained a muscle at first, but it’s just getting worse. (huh)

Patients will let you know if you’re uttering too much: They will abruptly stop talking because they think you’re trying to say something; they will look perplexed; they will ask you if you’re okay. And, full circle: Respond to what patients say and do. Tone down the utterances.

Your responses can also be words. A patient dislocated her shoulder and she feels great pain. She’s wincing, but otherwise quiet. Possible responses:

  • “Shoulder dislocations are really painful.” (acknowledges the pain associated with shoulder dislocations)
  • “Thank you for your patience throughout all of this.” (acknowledges her pain and your appreciation that she is cooperating as best as she can)
  • “How is the pain now?” (responding to the wince)

All of these responses, verbal or not, tell your patient that you are paying attention. We are not in an age (yet) where computers can provide accurate empathy and validation. Algorithms and technology have their place in medicine as treatments; physicians, as people, can provide care. Patients are grateful for care. It is care that acknowledges and respects their humanity, in sickness or in health. This is why people still consult human beings with medical degrees after an exhaustive search on Google.


Categories
Consult-Liaison Education Informal-curriculum Lessons Medicine Observations

Informal Curriculum: Lesson 2.

An “informal curriculum” refers to lessons that are not explicitly taught. In medicine, there are skills doctors learn that are rarely recorded in textbooks or overtly discussed during rounds or lectures. However, these are important skills that doctors need so they can work effectively with patients and colleagues. Lessons in the informal curriculum include how to present patient information to other doctors, how to discuss end of life care with the families of patients, etc.

Contrast this with the “formal curriculum”, which focuses on topics such as anatomy, physiology, and using the language of the field. Contrast this also with the “hidden curriculum”, which can include topics like how to hide medical errors, beliefs about the utility (or lack thereof) of different types of physicians, etc.

In this series, I will share some lessons from the informal curriculum about interviewing patients.[1. Back when I was a medical student, psychiatrists were still considered the artisans of the clinical interview… and not just dispensers of psychiatric medications.] I usually teach these lessons to medical students. Other physicians, psychiatrists or not, may find them useful. If for nothing else, this provides an opportunity for all of us to consider how physicians can improve interactions with patients.

I am purposely omitting the first recommendation for now because it is paramount, the most difficult to define, and often challenging to implement.

My second recommendation: Orient patients to the interview. Patients often don’t know what to expect during an initial visit with a doctor. It takes less than 60 seconds to explain the ground rules of the game of the clinical interview. Doing this can help dispel some of the anxiety patients may have about the meeting. It also gives physicians the opportunity to shape the interview before it begins.

Make introductions. Tell people your name. Ask patients for their name (and how they would prefer to be addressed). Though a power differential exists between doctor and patient, you’re both human beings. Good manners go a long way in building a strong working relationship. The person in front of you is not just a patient: He is a person with hobbies, strengths that you may not have, and a name. Acknowledge the person and at least learn his name.

Tell patients how much time you have together. In outpatient settings, most patients generally know how long appointments will last. In inpatient settings, the schedule is less clear. In both locations, however, patients may have expectations that you will spend much more time with them than you actually can. Explicitly announcing the amount of time available can help establish and maintain focus on the presenting problem.

Tell patients what will happen during the interview. You don’t have to present a detailed itinerary, but do give patients a general idea of what to expect. If you’ll be asking a lot of questions, say so. If you’ll be performing a procedure, explain what will happen. People generally don’t like surprises. Do your best to give patients enough information so they can prepare themselves for what’s next.

Tell patients that you might interrupt them. Sometimes, some patients may start telling you things that they think you want to know. Sometimes, this information is irrelevant. Because you only have limited time together and you may need information that patients may not think to tell you, tell patients that you might interrupt them before you ever do.

When I first meet patients, my preamble goes something like this:

Hi. My name is Dr. Yang and I work as a psychiatrist. We have about 45 minutes together. I’ll be asking you a lot of questions, some of which might make you wonder, “Why is she asking me that?” If you find me interrupting you, I’m not trying to be rude; I just want to make sure I get the right information.

It takes less than 30 seconds to say that. As a result, however, I have essentially let the patient know:

  1. We have time together, but it is limited. We’ll both try to stay focused on your concerns.
  2. You might find some of my questions weird. Humor me.
  3. I intend to be courteous, but I might be impolite because I might need information that you may not think to tell me.

Without this orientation, patients might end up telling me unnecessary information. They might feel vexed when I start asking questions they don’t expect (like when I ask about menstrual cycles, HIV status, or where they live). They might find my manner rude if I interrupt them to stay on track.

This is expectation management. And this can be one of the more important things we can do for patients.


Categories
Homelessness NYC Observations

Memorial.

Two weeks had passed before I learned what happened.

I hadn’t seen him in several months. At our last meeting, the trees were full of red and orange leaves. He, as usual, was not interested in talking to me. He was sitting in front of a closed shop.

“Hi. How are you?”

“Fine.”

People in the neighborhood took care of him. Surrounding him were several plastic bags holding neatly stacked styrofoam containers filled with soup. Another bag held several pastries, most of them still wrapped in clear cellophane. Another bag contained many empty, crushed water bottles.

“Anything new happening?”

“No.”

He was old enough to be my father, though he looked like he could be a grandfather. Time had taken away some of his teeth. The joints of his fingers were knobby. Crescents of dirt were caked underneath his nails. He was wearing a different coat.

“You got a new coat.”

“Yes.”

He previously wore a blue windbreaker; now he was wearing a puffy black jacket that was three sizes too big for him. His thin neck poked out above the collar. The jacket was unzipped and showed the soiled white tee shirt he wore underneath.

“Any more thoughts about going inside for the winter?”

“Not now.”

People were starting to gather around us. In that particular neighborhood, passersby routinely stopped and gawked whenever I spoke with people who appeared obviously homeless. They were staring at us, their mouths hanging open, their faces perplexed.

“Can I help you?” I barked at them, doing nothing to mask the irritation in my voice.

In response, they closed their mouths, turned away, and walked on. (Related: One of the fastest ways to get people in New York to stop looking at you is to say, “Hello!”)

“Where are you sleeping now?”

“In the park.”

Sometimes he slept in a box. He usually slept on a flattened box, and it often wasn’t in the park. People had seen him underneath nearby construction scaffolding. Others saw him in the subway station, though he didn’t seem to use the subways at all.

He said that he had been outside for “a while”. Records from the shelter and from concerned citizens in the neighborhood suggested that he had been outside for at least 20 years.

“I know you’ve heard this before, but just humor me: You don’t have to stay outside. You can stay in a small studio apartment where they serve two meals a day, you can store your belongings there—”

“I’m okay.”

I felt for him. I wouldn’t want to talk to me if I were him.

When homeless people disappear from their usual locations, I wonder: Have they moved to a different neighborhood? Were they arrested and now in jail? Did they find a place to live? Are they in a hospital?

I often never find out.

This man had died. He contracted pneumonia and was in an intensive care unit for about a week. Was there a code? Did the physicians withdraw care? If so, who made that decision? Was anyone with him when he died?

There was no funeral. There was no memorial. Did anyone from the neighborhood notice that he was gone? Did any of those people who gawked at us notice his absence? Did people assume that he ultimately agreed to go into housing, that he finally changed his mind?

Did anyone think that he had died? Did anyone miss him?