Categories
Nonfiction Reflection Seattle

How About Those Mariners?

In January of 2024, I made a deliberate choice to be a Baseball Fan. There were two reasons behind this:

  • My spouse is a lifelong baseball fan and I wanted to be a better spouse. We had gone to a few games when his team was in town to play the Seattle Mariners, but my appreciation was limited to “vibes” only.
  • Someone I loved very much was disintegrating. Cheering a baseball team was a socially acceptable way to shout and channel my heartache in public.

I had choices to make, though: Do I invest my enthusiasm in my spouse’s team? In their pinstripes they have won the most number of World Series (and reminds everyone of it). Or do I dedicate my ardor to the team that has never been to the World Series, the Seattle Mariners?

Dear reader, you already know who got my vote. The West Coast is the Best Coast.


A sponge for learning, I asked many questions during my 2024 baseball education. Once I understood what “starting rotation” meant, what made the Mariner pitchers so effective? Why does “Wins Above Replacement” matter? What does “On-base Plus Slugging” represent? Why did Ty France get hit by pitch so much? Teams can designate players for assignment just like that???

My spouse’s eyes never rolled out of his head, though that would have been a reasonable response to some of my questions. Every morning I read the SB Nation site for the Mariners, Lookout Landing. I announced my burgeoning interest in baseball to other Mariners fans. They all looked at me with some amount of pity.

In our 2024 Christmas card I commented that my choice to become a fan of the Seattle Mariners was a mistake. I now understood the shirt I had seen around town: A trident, to represent the Mariners, and the text, “Maybe next year!


Before the baseball season started in 2025, the person I loved very much died. As the year unfolded, wars continued, injustice ascended, ethics eroded. Cheering a baseball team is a socially acceptable way to redirect the energies of grief and anger in public.

My investment in the Seattle Mariners grew. This culminated in the sheer amount of kilojoules I spent this week on this team, which is now the American League West champion! This hasn’t happened in 24 years.

Furthermore, our humble catcher, Cal Raleigh, made home run history, both as a catcher and as a switch hitter. (His nickname is “The Big Dumper”. Have you seen the size of his butt?)

This has prompted questions about identity:

  • I didn’t grow up in a baseball household. (Basketball came first, then football.)
  • I historically have found baseball boring.
  • Could fans of America’s pastime look like me?
  • Am I now one of those people who can spout random facts about baseball?

Dear reader, the answer to all those questions is yes. That’s super weird.


As the Seattle Mariners crested towards the end of the season, baseball became a laboratory of communication.

I previously envied the way men who did not know each other could immediately engage in energetic conversations about sports. Sometimes it seemed like they had known each other for years.

What I noticed now, though, was the increasing amount of communication — particularly in the form of text messages — solely about baseball. Practically all these people are good friends I have known for years. There are real tragedies happening in their lives: parents who are deteriorating; pets dying; friends with conditions that elude treatment; people losing their jobs.

Meanwhile, they send messages acknowledging Cal Raleigh’s 60th home run.

How are they themselves doing? No comment.


I don’t know if it’s true that, because of my professional training, it is easier for me to have in-depth conversations with people. Do I have skills to create conditions so people will be more likely to share sensitive personal information with me? I hope so, but I don’t actually know.

It’s true: Talking about baseball is easier than talking about hopes, fears, dreams, and loss. It’s natural to avoid delving into more meaningful topics. We fear how others will react to our vulnerabilities, to the soft spots we keep covered to prevent bruises from the outside world.

The thing is, we’re often our own harshest critics. Our good friends aren’t umpires. They’re not calling balls and strikes on us. They are instead in the dugout or on deck, admiring our approaches to the plate.


But let me be honest: Have I already forgotten the reasons why I chose to become a Baseball Fan? Weren’t there thoughts and emotions I sought to shun? I couldn’t escape anticipatory grief. The crying was exhausting. Wasn’t I looking for a healthy yet avoidant way to cope?

So, here’s to the 2025 Seattle Mariners. May their success continue. May they go to (and win!) the World Series. May they continue to be a bright spot amid the challenges we all have in our small lives and big communities.

Categories
Reflection

Words Have Meaning.

Shortly after I learned of the murder of Charlie Kirk, I thought of the manifesto from People Reluctant To Kill for an Abstraction. George Saunders wrote it in 2004:

Last Thursday, my organization, People Reluctant To Kill for an Abstraction, orchestrated an overwhelming show of force around the globe.

At precisely 9 in the morning, working with focus and stealth, our entire membership succeeded in simultaneously beheading no one. At 10, Phase II began…

It’s true. Millions of people around the world, despite whatever grievances they hold, somehow refrain from killing other people. Most people go through their entire lives without murdering a single person! If only this could be true for all people.

Since the world began, we have gone about our work quietly, resisting the urge to generalize, valuing the individual over the group, the actual over the conceptual, the inherent sweetness of the present moment over the theoretically peaceful future to be obtained via murder.


Do we all agree that words have meaning? Jamelle Bouie comments:

It is sometimes considered gauche, in the world of American political commentary, to give words the weight of their meaning. As this thinking goes, there might be real belief, somewhere, in the provocations of our pundits, but much of it is just performance, and it doesn’t seem fair to condemn someone for the skill of putting on a good show.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) uses this triangle as a model for our minds:

(from Beacon)

We can’t read minds, but we can infer what people are thinking about through their speech. Thoughts influence feelings and behaviors—and not just in ourselves, but in those who listen to what we say.

To be clear, no one deserves to be murdered because of what they say.

It is also true, though, that the words we use have the power to unite or divide, to cultivate love or hate. don Miguel Ruiz notes, “The first and most important of The Four Agreements is be impeccable with your word” because:

The word, as a symbol, has the magic and power of creation because it can reproduce an image, an idea, a feeling, or an entire story in your imagination. Just hearing the word horse can reproduce an entire image in your mind. That’s the power of a symbol.

We can cast magical spells with our words. How do you want to use the power of your words? What emotions or behaviors might manifest from the spells you cast?


Brian Kilmeade of Fox News cast a vile spell earlier this week in advocating that mentally ill homeless people should be executed:

Jones was talking on “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday about public money spent on trying to help homeless people and suggested that those who didn’t accept services offered to them should be jailed.

“Or involuntary lethal injection, or something,” Kilmeade said. “Just kill ‘em.”

Should Kilmeade be killed for making this obscene remark? No.

If we believe words are thoughts embodied, then we must believe that these words have meaning and can manifest in behaviors. What we say can affect what we and others do.

This is why we hold Kilmeade and all others who make hateful comments accountable for what they say. We will not repeat the mistake that Kilmeade made: We will recognize the humanity of all people, including him. One of the best ways we can humanize other people is to believe they meant what they said, even if we don’t agree with it. What Kilmeade said is abhorrent.

Millions of people around the world, despite whatever grievances they hold, somehow refrain from talking about killing other people. Many people go through their entire lives without talking about murdering a single person! If only this could be true for everyone.

Categories
Lessons Reflection

Your Six-Foot Radius.

I don’t think I was that mouthy during my medical training.

Some East Asian women are shy, deferential, and taciturn. It’s no wonder some people were surprised when critical comments came out of the mouth that is attached to my face.

Advocacy comes in different flavors. My initial attempts were salty.

While I didn’t occupy the lowest rung on the neurology service (that honor went to the medical students), I was but an intern. Furthermore, I wasn’t even an neurology intern. I was training to become a psychiatrist.

The attending neurologist, who looked like those doctors exalted in enormous oil paintings that adorn the hallways of hospitals, had too many letters after his name. He also riffed on too many subjects unrelated to neurology during our morning rounds.

Rounds in academic medical centers serve two main purposes: To organize care for patients, and to educate trainees. The team, under the guidance of the attending physician, executes the plan of care for each patient following rounds.

One autumn morning we stood in a circle outside of a patient’s room. Rounds were just starting. Patients—and a whole lotta work—awaited us.

“It’s the season for soup,” the attending neurologist opened, smiling. “Chief Resident, what is your favorite kind of soup?”

I couldn’t restrain myself.

”Can we not talk about soup? There are patients waiting and work we need to do,” I snapped. My fellow intern, a future emergency physician and more accepting of reality than me, didn’t stifle his laughter in time.

Both the chief resident and frowning attending physician shot me a look. “I know you’re focused on getting work done, Dr. Yang,” the chief resident chided, “but there is time to talk about other things.”

My cheeks burned. But no one spoke more of soup. We started talking about the patient waiting in the room. 




Three years later, I myself became a chief resident. Junior residents shared with me that one of the attending psychiatrists, another decorated physician considered a national expert in his field, wasn’t meeting with them for supervision. This was one of his responsibilities. Esteemed professors were supposed to spend time with us trainees so we could learn from them. He wasn’t doing his job.

Chief residents have some responsibility to advocate for junior residents. Annoyed, I asked to meet with him. This flavor of advocacy was spicy.

He didn’t ask for an agenda ahead of time and I didn’t think to provide one. After sharing with him what residents told me, I said, “It is your responsibility to meet with residents for supervision. Why isn’t this happening?”



Well, you can imagine how that went. He became shouty, waved his arms, and wondered how I, a mere resident, had the audacity to talk to him that way.

My cheeks burned again. However, he didn’t deny the allegation.

My program director was dismayed—maybe embarrassed on my behalf?—when I told her what happened. “You didn’t need to tell him yourself!” she exclaimed. “You could have told me and I could have spoken with him.”

The junior residents told me later that he had reached out to schedule regular supervision with them all. 




With additional experience (read: missteps and errors), my advocacy is now more mellow. I’ve learned to ask more questions, orient people ahead of time, and be more mindful of power and status. When all else fails, be direct.

The word “advocacy” often conjures political images: chanting slogans at rallies or calling elected officials.

But those aren’t the only ways to advocate for ideas you value. Effective advocacy can happen within our six-foot radius. It’s asking questions or making statements. Sometimes, it only takes a short conversation to start shifting long-held assumptions:

“Quite frankly, I wish the president would give us a purge [of homeless people]. Because we do need to purge these people.”

“I wonder what the parents and friends of homeless people would think of that plan. What hopes and dreams do you think they had as kids? Surely they didn’t aspire to be homeless.”

“Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas.”

“When you say ‘lunatic’, what does that mean? What is the process for applying for a visa, anyway? It’s following the law, right?”

“The probability of a trans person being violent appears to be vastly higher than non-trans.”

“I don’t think that’s true, but let’s look at the data together. Where can we look to learn accurate information?

Advocacy can look like curiosity. At its sweetest, advocacy illuminates the humanity of others. Such reminders can take just a few seconds.

To be clear, this doesn’t mean talking to anyone and everyone who enters your six-foot radius. A small minority of people are not curious and not interested in dialogue. They seek targets for their frustration and anger. If you’ve tried to make a connection in good faith, but the effort is not reciprocated, stop. Sometimes, quitting is the best option.

In times—these times—when problems feel too big for us to understand or solve, when we feel like nothing we do makes a difference, speaking up still matters. Your statements (or silence!) affects other people.

Advocacy doesn’t have to involve bullhorns or giant signs. Do not obey in advance. Have faith in what you can accomplish within your six-foot radius.

Categories
Reflection

Obituary for Yang the Elder.

Yang the Elder died at the age of 77 on February 8th, 2025. He would not approve of this obituary.

Mourning his death are his two older brothers, but his favorite (and only) child misses him the most.

He was born in Yangzhou, China, though, six months later, his parents scooped him and his three older brothers up and left the country. They settled in Taiwan and it was there that he met his future wife (who preceded him in death).

After graduating from college in Taichung with high marks and completing mandatory military service, he was accepted at the University of Detroit to earn a Master’s degree in applied math. This was his ticket to the United States to pursue the American Dream.

He was a computer programmer before it was cool. As one of the few people who knew how to operate mainframe computers, which occupied entire rooms, he had a productive career in systems programming. This amazing immigrant worked at major American corporations like IBM, Amtrak, Boeing, and McDonnell Douglas. It was with enthusiasm and wonder that he introduced his family to the “World Wide Web” in the early 1990s. He continued to be an early adopter of computer technology, which is why he used emojis with ease up until the last year of his life.

He loved the idea of America. He believed in and defended democracy. After the Tiananmen Square Massacre, he took his family to the federal building in Los Angeles to protest the Chinese government’s actions. Later, during what started out as a peaceful family picnic in Yosemite Valley at his favorite national park, he ended up arguing with tourists from China about how the Chinese government was wrong to kill their own people.

He appreciated many aspects of American culture: He never missed a senior discount shopping day. Music by Simon and Garfunkel, the Beatles, Judy Collins, and Stevie Wonder brought him pleasure. He continued to shout encouragement at the Washington Redskins (now Commanders) on TV even after the family moved to California. His collection of Converse shoes (all purchased on sale) was spectacular, particularly a maroon pair with matching polka-dot laces.

Kindness and courtesy were important to him: He learned the names of people who helped him and greeted them by name whenever he saw them. He routinely gave small snacks to familiar grocery clerks, building janitors, and the barber. He said “thank you” whenever the opportunity arose.

Lastly, he enjoyed being outside and taking long walks. If a tree was bearing fruit, he’d casually pluck one from a branch, peel it open, and taste it. He could identify all the skyscrapers in downtown Seattle by name. He always looked for life in the water and among the clouds.

Per his wishes, there will not be a funeral or memorial.

If you live in or around Seattle, his favorite parks included the Washington Arboretum, Seward Park, and Myrtle Edwards Park. Regardless of where you are, in his memory, take a walk outside and marvel at the trees, water, and sky.

Categories
Observations Reflection

Mental Habits.

We got on the topic of nightclubs.

“I’ve never been to that nightclub,” I said.

“Yeah, I’ve never seen you there,” The Person replied, before adding, without any malice, “… you seem like you’d go to the Wildrose.”

I couldn’t help but laugh. That allowed the moment to pass, a question to leave unanswered.

The Wildrose is a lesbian bar in Seattle. (It’s apparently the oldest lesbian bar in the US.)

The Person’s error wasn’t about my sexual preferences; it was that they thought I go to nightclubs!†


What impression do you have of The Person?

Would your impression change if The Person is:

  • a man?
  • a woman?
  • the teenage child of a friend?
  • a stranger over the age of 70?
  • a white person? a non-white person?
  • a straight person? a queer person?
  • my boss?

As much as we try, we can never really get away from ourselves. We all think we view the world through relatively impartial lenses. Then we encounter people and situations that trigger our mental habits.

Like viewing the world and the people in it through the lens of sexual preferences.

Or believing that blog posts are only worthwhile if they resemble articles.


† Long-time readers know my opinions about dancing.