Categories
Blogosphere Medicine Observations Policy Systems

Why I Work at the Fringe.

This article is making the rounds among physicians on Twitter. Much of the information in the article, unfortunately, is accurate.

For some of the reasons stated there, I left the “traditional” health care system and pursued work at the “fringe”.

Part of this is due to my clinical interests: I like working at the intersections of different fields. For example, I like the intersection of psychiatry and hospital medicine, which is called psychosomatic medicine. Another example is my interest in public psychiatry, which focuses on the intersection of social factors and mental health (e.g., individuals with psychiatric and substance use conditions in the context of homelessness and poverty).[1. Really, though, all of medicine could be “psychosomatic medicine” or “public psychiatry”; the divisions between mind, body, and environment are arbitrary.]

Part of this, though, was my sense that the system would not let me be the kind of doctor I want to be.

For a brief period I worked in a clinic where I had slots for four new intakes a day (60 minutes each) and 15-minute follow-up appointments for the rest of the day. If my schedule was completely filled with follow-up appointments, I could have seen up to 34 patients a day. (I never got to this point because I quit well before my panel got full.)

In reality, the 15-minute appointments were 12-minute appointments. I needed about three minutes to type out some notes to myself for clinical documentation.[2. I don’t like typing my note while I am seeing a patient. I’m not fully attending to either one when I do that.]

Because I was building a new practice, people with a wide variety of conditions and concerns came to see me. I was advised to refer patients out of the medical center who were “too sick”. This included individuals who were frequently in and out of psychiatric hospitals, had significant psychiatric symptoms, or otherwise had other stressors in their lives that made them “difficult“.

In other words, they told me to refer out the people who needed specialist care the most.

The reality, too, was that no psychiatrist could provide quality care to these individuals in 12 minutes. Imagine someone with depression so severe that he lacks the energy or interest to share his current distress with you. Or someone who is psychotic and insists that her ex-husband is tracking her through all the electronics in her home. Or someone who is so anxious about leaving his house that his attendance to the clinic is worthy of celebration.

Obtaining an accurate history guides diagnosis, which then guides treatment. An insufficient history can thus lead to haphazard interventions. You can see how the 15-minute appointment model results in heavy reliance upon (potentially unnecessary) medications. If someone says he feels depressed, it’s difficult to validate his emotional experience, provide education about his condition and non-pharmacological ways to manage it (e.g., behavioral activation, sleep hygiene, etc.), and have a discussion about medications, which should always include risks, benefits, and alternatives, in 12 minutes.

It is much easier to write a script and ask someone to return in a month. (This inspired my post about the Automated Psychiatrist Machine.)

Furthermore, this clinic was in a medical center with a group of primary care physicians. Primary care doctors referred their patients with diagnoses of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder to the psychiatry clinic (as they should). These individuals, however, were “too sick”. Never mind that, unlike the primary care physicians, we psychiatrists had the training to diagnose, treat, and manage these individuals with significant psychiatric conditions.

Thus, these patients often returned to their poor primary care physicians, who tried to care for them the best they could… which often entailed medication regimens that were unnecessary. (Primary care physicians deserve no blame for this: How are they supposed to know?)

This clinic also “rewarded” psychiatrists for “productivity”. The more patients a psychiatrist saw, the more money the psychiatrist would earn. This led to “cherry-picking” patients. Psychiatrists would keep patients who either had minor conditions or symptoms that had resolved, because those are the patients you can adequately see in 12 minutes. As a consequence, patients with more debilitating symptoms could not access the clinic. The psychiatrists had no incentives in either time or money to send these “cherry-picked” patients back to their primary care doctors.

My frustration and disillusionment compelled me to leave the job. I returned to positions at the “fringe” to work with patients who often are also not part of the system or patients that the system had failed. Consider the man who has been homeless for the past ten years and is too paranoid to access any health care service. Or the woman who was beaten and molested as a child, sent to foster care and group homes, never completed high school, “aged out” of youth care, and now has no resources or support.

I couldn’t wait for the system to change, so I sought out settings where both my skills would be useful and I could be the kind of doctor I want to be. There may not be many physician jobs at the “fringe” and certainly not all physicians want to work there. When we physicians vote with our feet, though, we show what we value, the kind of care patients deserve, and how the system must change.


Categories
Consult-Liaison Education Medicine Reading

DSM-5: Malingering.

My DSM-5 group has lost its previous vitality for the same reasons my blog has lost its previous verve (pending job change, ongoing family health concerns). But! The DSM-5 group has had a few updates; the most recent edition is below. If you’re interested in subscribing to the DSM-5 e-mail group, you can sign up here.


Malingering in DSM-5, like in DSM-IV, is a “V code”. “V codes” (in ICD-9) will turn into “Z codes” (in ICD-10) and these are considered “other conditions that may be a focus on clinical attention”. This means two things:

(1) Conditions listed as “V codes” are not diagnoses because

(2) Conditions listed as “V codes” are not mental disorders.

Therefore, malingering is not a mental disorder.

In crass terms, malingering means that people are faking or *really* embellishing physical or psychological symptoms. People who are malingering do this “consciously” (hat tip to the analysts) because there is an external incentive to do so. These external incentives might include:

a) avoiding military duty
b) avoiding work
c) obtaining financial compensation
d) evading criminal prosecution
e) obtaining drugs

Malingering can be hugely adaptive: If you were homeless and the temperatures outside are below freezing and a winter wind is whipping the frost off of the trees and there are no open shelter beds and you are hungry because the last time you ate was two days ago and that was a soggy, half-eaten sandwich you found in the trashcan–

–wouldn’t you consider going to the hospital and say that you want to kill yourself so you could be in a warm place for a few hours and get some non-soggy food?

DSM-5 argues that if “any combination” of the following four items is present in a patient, you should consider the condition of malingering:

(1) Medicolegal context of presentation (a lawyer sends the client for evaluation or the patient presents for care in the midst of criminal charges)

(2) There is a “marked discrepancy” between the individual’s “claimed stress or disability” and “objective findings and observations”

(3) “Lack of cooperation during the diagnostic evaluation and in complying with the prescribed treatment regimen” (some tired clinicians would summarize this as “a difficult patient”, though I much prefer DSM-5’s description)

(4) The presence of antisocial personality disorder

I applaud DSM-5’s efforts in keeping the description of malingering neutral. Some people have strong reactions towards (translation: self-righteous fury at) people who present with malingering. Keeping the focus on the behaviors helps temper the emotional reactions.

DSM-5 then clarifies the differences between malingering and factitious disorder, conversion disorder, and related conditions. Malingering is the only condition here where symptoms appear solely because there is an external incentive.

On a somewhat related note, the condition that follows malingering in DSM-5 is “wandering associated with a mental disorder”. This is apparently limited to walking (where the “desire to walk about leads to significant clinical management or safety concerns”).

The next post will hopefully show up less than one month away.

Categories
Blogosphere Medicine Observations

Fear and the Online Physician.

To follow up on my last post I had intended to write something that follows the style of an FAQ:

  • What if your patients read your blog?
  • What if your boss reads your blog?
  • What if your patients ask you for medical advice through your blog?

Fear underlies all of those questions, though, and it seemed to make more sense to address that fear.

If you are a physician and you are concerned about the vulnerability of having an online presence, what do you worry about? Do you worry that patients will learn to hate you? That your boss will find a reason to fire you? That random patients will “bother” you?[1. Why do some physicians worry that patients will find them online and “bother” them? What low opinions we must have of patients if we automatically assume that they will “bother” us! And what little faith we must have in ourselves to establish and maintain boundaries should that happen! And how grandiose we must be to believe that patients want to expend the time and energy to “bother” us!]

Would you do something on the internet that you wouldn’t do “in real life” as a physician?

All the people you interact with as a physician—your patients, your colleagues, that person who works in the system, but you see him only every few months—already have opinions about you. You build your reputation with the little things you do every day.

If you think patients are lazy, your behavior will reveal that belief. If you tell someone (a colleague! a friend! another patient!) that you think patients are lazy, that will eventually become common knowledge. If someone confronts you about that, you’ll manage it the way you manage it… and people will observe that, too.

Recording your belief on the internet that patients are lazy seems like a bad idea (because it is). Stuff stays online for a long time and people will find it. If that scares you, it should. But if you’re not doing things like that “in real life” now, why would you suddenly start doing that on the internet?

You might think that the lack of an online presence (or having an anonymous presence[2. It may be true that physicians, under cloaks of ostensible anonymity, can report and discuss problems in medicine with greater candor. Whistle-blowing can be a good and necessary thing. However, anonymity is ultimately short-sighted: It is difficult to maintain true anonymity on the internet. More importantly, if people know who you are, you have greater power and credibility to identify and solve problems.]) will protect you because if they can’t find you, they won’t talk about who you are, what you think, and what you do.

That’s not true. People already talk about you.[3. Yes, people are talking about you, but let’s be realistic: They don’t talk about you all the time. Or even all that often.]

And these are people who know what you look like, know where you work, and have experience interacting with you. Patients who don’t like you will continue to dislike you. They’ve probably told someone why they don’t like you. Who knows: They might’ve even shared their opinions about you on the internet. (As I have noted elsewhere: Having an online presence gives you the opportunity to shape your reputation on the internet. You already take active steps to shape your reputation “in real life”: Maybe you make a point of greeting everyone at work with a smile. Or overtly washing your hands in front of patients.)

The internet may be different medium, but the messages we send are the same. It’s also a place to learn and exchange ideas: What are other medical professionals learning? What do patients want? What problems are we trying to solve? How can we make things better? We’d like you to join the conversation.

As a physician you’re trained to discuss risks, benefits, and alternatives about interventions with patients. Having a presence online has its own risks and benefits. If you do decide to step into the online arena, know that you aren’t alone: There are many physicians who write on the internet. Join us.


Categories
Consult-Liaison Education Lessons Medicine Systems

Have You Thanked Your Nurse Today?

As I noted earlier, hospitals permit around-the-clock observation of patients. If you don’t need around-the-clock monitoring, you don’t need to be in the hospital.[1. “But what about ‘social admits’?” you may cry. “They don’t need to be in the hospital, but we admit them anyway.” True. “Social admits” reflect the intersections of social policy, politics, health, economics, and the lack of resources. That topic is beyond the scope of this post.]

Who is doing this around-the-clock monitoring? Nurses.

Therefore, whether you are a patient or a physician, one of the best things you can do is get on the good side of the nurses.

If you are a patient, a nurse watches over you and your care. Nurses make sure that you won’t fall. They make sure they give the right dose of the right medication in the right route to the right person at the right time (which can be easier said than done). Nurses provide education about medicines, tests, and health conditions. They make sure you know what day it is, where you are, and who you are. (Also easier said than done.) They monitor your progress and try to ensure that your health only improves. Nurses can also page the doctor for you or your family. They can find out when you are scheduled to go through a procedure. They can find out what you are waiting for. Nurses advocate for you.

Sometimes it may seem like they’re not “doing” anything. They are. They’re keeping an eye on what is happening with your health.

If you are a physician, you must already recognize the value of nurses. (If you are a medical student or resident and have fantasies that, one day, you will be “running the show”, don’t be a fool: There is no way you could do your work in the hospital without the help of nurses.) Nurses serve as our eyes and ears. They tell us information about patients that patients themselves cannot or will not tell us. They do triage with us when we have multiple patients who are not doing well simultaneously. They tell us if someone is starting to look a lot worse… or a lot better.

While it is true that nurses provide around-the-clock observation of patients in hospitals, it is also true that nurses provide around-the-clock monitoring of doctors in hospitals.

Nurses know when doctors typically meet with patients. They know which doctors are more likely to spend time with patients and answer questions. They know which doctors work in collaboration with nurses and which ones treat them like second-class citizens. They know which doctors return pages promptly. Nurses quickly learn how to alter their approaches with various doctors to get work done.

This is yet another reason why, as a patient, you want to get on the good side of nurses. Nurses manage doctors. Skilled nurses will know how to work with different doctors to help you get what you want (e.g., answers to your questions, a meeting with your family, better pain control).

(Patients, you should also know that nurses also manage you. Nurses tell doctors which patients yell at nurses, which family members are berating them, which patients are trying hard to follow recommendations, and which family members left cookies and treats for them.)

Physicians, thank your nurses for helping you do your job better. Positive reinforcement and good manners go a long way. The more you acknowledge the skills and efforts of your nurses, the more they will want to work with you and make your job easier.

Patients, thank your nurses for watching over you. Nurses play an essential role in your care in the hospital. Be kind to them. The more you acknowledge the skills and efforts of your nurses, the more they will want to work with you to get you back to health as soon as possible.


Categories
Consult-Liaison Education Medicine Observations Reflection

The Patience of Patients.

When I was a resident one of my attendings said, “You know why patients are called ‘patients’? It’s because they have a lot of patience. For us.”

Patients in hospitals do a lot of waiting. They wait for physicians. They wait for nurses. They wait to use the bathroom. They wait to undergo procedures. They wait for their IVs to stop beeping. They wait for the person next door to stop vomiting up what sounds like all of their internal organs. They wait for the person down the hall to stop screaming. They wait to eat. (Doctors: Reverse those NPO orders as soon as you can! Food is at the base of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs! Food is more important than safety and security of health!) They wait for the nursing assistants to finish taking their blood pressures so they can sleep. They wait for the unit clerk to answer the phone so a nurse can help them get out of bed without the bed alarms screeching throughout the unit.

They wait to feel better. They wait for good news.

No one has any idea how much patients wait in the hospital until you become a patient in the hospital.

Sometimes it’s not even clear what patients are waiting for. Hospital staff arrive and they have no idea why they are there:

  • “Hi, I’m the physical therapist.”
  • “Hi, I’m here to take you down for an ultrasound.”
  • “Hi, I’m the dietician.”
  • “Hi, I’m the consulting psychiatrist.”[1. Hospitalists: If you call a psychiatry consult for your patient, tell your patient. Most people, with or without psychiatric issues, do not appreciate an unexpected visit from a psychiatrist. “I’m not crazy! Get out of my room! No one asked you to come here!”]

Because of the nature of acute care in hospitals, rarely do things run on a consistent, predictable schedule. This lack of punctuality is not intentional; things change. Hospital staff triage patients all the time and, unfortunately, patients and patient care are shuffled around in order of acuity.

Thus, if you’re in a hospital and someone tells you that So-and-So will see you at 2pm, don’t believe it. Yes, So-and-So might actually see you at 2pm, but it takes extraordinary planetary alignment for that to happen. So-and-So might show up at noon… or at 4:30pm.

Yes, doctors wait, too. The waiting doctors do, though, is informed by the knowledge they have about why they’re waiting. Doctors wait for patients to come out of the bathroom. They wait for patients to go for a study or imaging test. They wait for family members to arrive to get more history. They wait for the pathology or study results to clarify diagnosis and treatment. They wait for information that affects what happens next.

Patients often wait without knowing what will happen next.

If you work in a hospital, remember that most patients have an extraordinary amount of patience, given the circumstances. Yes, there is a minuscule minority who have the frustration tolerance and impulse control of toddlers, but that is not a common means of coping in adults. (Physicians tend to call psychiatry when this happens. This is not a common consult.)

Do what you can to orient patients to what is going on. Give them approximate times for your visits and if you are running late, send a message to them to let them know. (Technology could help here: What if we could send text messages to patients through the television? or if the text message could become a voice message on their in-room telephones?) If patients are not around when you come by to see them, leave a note to let them know that you’ll try again later. (Technology could help with this, too.) Tell them why you don’t want them to eat after midnight. Tell them why you want them to work with physical therapy. Tell them the purpose of the bed alarm.

Help them understand what they are waiting for. Don’t take their patience for granted.